Germany Advocates for CSRD Reporting Delays & Simplifications Ahead of Federal Elections

Germany has thrown its hat into the sustainability ring—though not quite in the way Brussels might have hoped. Just weeks before a pivotal federal election, and amid the collapse of its coalition government, Berlin is calling for a major rethink of the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). The proposals aim to give smaller companies a two-year reprieve from sustainability reporting requirements and eliminate sector-specific obligations entirely.

Federal Finance Minister Jörg Kukies recently aired these ambitions in an interview with Börsen-Zeitung, Germany’s financial daily, echoing points from a leaked letter signed by senior government officials to the European Commission. While the timing may be politically charged, the proposals highlight a growing tension between ambitious sustainability goals and the realities of bureaucracy.

For the uninitiated, the CSRD is the EU’s big-ticket upgrade to its previous Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). Think of it as a sweeping mandate for transparency, one designed to compel over 50,000 companies—up from just 12,000—to report on their environmental and social impacts, as well as their sustainability-related risks.

In theory, it’s a game-changer for ESG (environmental, social, and governance) accountability. In practice? Well, let’s just say it’s keeping CFOs awake at night. The directive doesn’t just ask companies to nod toward sustainability—it demands detailed disclosures based on the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS).

The CSRD’s phased rollout began in 2024, targeting large companies with over 500 employees. Mid-sized businesses and listed small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are next in line, with compliance dates set for 2025 and 2026, respectively. The directive even extends its reach beyond Europe, pulling in non-EU companies with significant EU revenues starting in 2029.

Germany’s Case for a Breather

Enter Germany, where approximately 13,000 companies are bracing for the CSRD’s impact. Kukies has painted a stark picture: these businesses will be required to churn out around 1,000 data points—or, in cases where that’s not possible, explain why not.

Unsurprisingly, Germany’s government is saying, “Hold on a second.”

Here’s what they’re proposing:

1. Hit the brakes for SMEs: Instead of diving into CSRD compliance in 2026, smaller businesses would get two extra years to prepare.
2. Scrap sector-specific requirements: Why add another layer of complexity? Kukies suggests focusing on a streamlined approach.
3. Raise the threshold for inclusion: Though not addressed in Kukies’ interview, the leaked letter reveals a push to limit the number of companies required to report under the CSRD.

For Kukies, it’s about balance. He argues that the EU’s sustainability ambitions mustn’t overwhelm the very businesses they’re meant to involve. “The time gained by the two-year delay should be used to rethink a significantly streamlined, effective, and efficient system for sustainability reporting,” he told Börsen-Zeitung.

Bureaucracy Overload

It’s not just the CSRD keeping Germany’s policymakers up at night. Kukies also pointed to new ESG reporting requirements for banks from the European Banking Authority, which he says will force even small banks to request reams of data from clients.

This, he warns, could spark “a new wave of bureaucracy.”

Kukies’ solution? Synchronization. He envisions a system where companies report once, and that data seamlessly fulfills the requirements of multiple frameworks.

“The different reporting regimes should be synchronized so that each data point only has to be reported once,” he said. “We need more fundamental regulations and less micromanagement. Additionally, European and international regulations must be aligned and interpreted uniformly.”

Timing Is Everything

Of course, there’s no ignoring the political context. With elections on the horizon and the government in disarray, the push to delay and simplify CSRD requirements might look like a bid to curry favor with the business community. But it also raises a broader question: Is Europe’s sustainability reporting regime moving too fast for its own good?

While Germany’s proposals may find support among businesses drowning in ESG obligations, they could face resistance from those who see any delay as a step back in the fight for transparency and sustainability.

For now, all eyes are on the European Commission, as Germany makes its case for a more measured approach to sustainability reporting. Will Berlin’s call for balance resonate across the EU? Or will the bloc hold the line on its ambitious reporting timeline?

One thing’s certain—this debate is far from over.

The GRC Report is your premier destination for the latest in governance, risk, and compliance news. As your reliable source for comprehensive coverage, we ensure you stay informed and ready to navigate the dynamic landscape of GRC. Beyond being a news source, the GRC Report represents a thriving community of professionals who, like you, are dedicated to GRC excellence. Explore our insightful articles and breaking news, and actively participate in the conversation to enhance your GRC journey.