Finland’s financial regulator sees room to make the rulebook simpler. What it does not see is a reason to surrender the resilience that has allowed the country’s financial sector to withstand years of economic and market uncertainty.
Europe’s financial system has spent much of 2026 absorbing shocks without looking particularly shaken by them. Markets have lurched with geopolitical events and energy prices. Cyber threats have persisted. New technologies have developed faster than the institutions charged with overseeing them can comfortably digest. Through it all, European banks, insurers and investment funds have remained remarkably sturdy.
Most organizations know what they would do if a critical system went down. There are incident response plans, disaster recovery arrangements and business continuity procedures designed for exactly that scenario. But there is another question we don't ask nearly as often: What happens if the technology hasn't failed, but your organization can no longer use it?
More than half of the cyber incidents recorded by the European Union’s cybersecurity agency last year were distributed denial-of-service attacks. Most were not especially damaging, but they were, however, remarkably easy to summon. A political statement, an election, a protest or another turn in the war in Ukraine could be enough. Hacktivist groups claimed 4,709 attacks against EU Member States during 2025, according to ENISA’s latest Threat Landscape report, and more than 89% involved DDoS attacks. Public administrations bore much of it.
The World Economic Forum’s new Risk Management, Reimagined: Outlook to 2035 is one of the more thoughtful critiques of traditional risk management I have read in some time. It also stops one important step short.
The problems that kept European supply-chain managers awake a few years ago have become considerably less troublesome. Raw materials are easier to secure, semiconductors are less scarce, goods are moving, but the trouble has migrated elsewhere.Between 2023 and 2025, the share of EU firms reporting raw materials as a supply-chain obstacle fell from 27% to 8%, according to a new study from the European Investment Bank (EIB) and European Commission. Semiconductor concerns dropped from 15% to 3%, while logistics obstacles fell from 28% to 12%.
In risk management, we tend to obsess over black swans. Rare, unpredictable, high impact shocks that arrive without warning and rewrite the narrative overnight. Yet most organizational failures are not born from surprise. They emerge from visible, accelerating threats that were identified, debated, scored, and then quietly deprioritized because mitigation was inconvenient, expensive, or politically uncomfortable. These are gray rhinos. High probability, high impact risks charging directly at the organization. The breakdown is not foresight. It is governance.