Wells Fargo Fined $400,000 by FINRA for Supervisory Failures

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has taken enforcement action against Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC (WFCS) for significant supervisory failures related to the short-term trading of certain investment products. This action comes as part of a settlement agreement reached between FINRA and WFCS, highlighting ongoing compliance challenges within one of the nation's largest financial institutions.

As part of the settlement, FINRA has ordered WFCS to pay a fine of $400,000, provide $599,025.29 in restitution to affected customers (plus interest), and disgorge $2,031,972.10 in profits (plus interest). These penalties stem from violations that occurred between January 2017 and December 2018, during which WFCS failed to adequately supervise its representatives' recommendations of short-term trades in syndicate preferred stock, closed-end funds (CEFs), and medium-term notes (MTNs).

FINRA's investigation uncovered several critical supervisory failures. Primarily, WFCS failed to reasonably supervise a former registered representative who recommended unsuitable, short-term trading of syndicate products to retail customers. This individual recommended 118 purchases of syndicate preferred stock and CEFs, followed by short-term sales at a loss, and engaged in 13 similar transactions involving MTNs. Often, the representative recommended new purchases shortly after sales, generating additional sales concessions. Despite identifying red flags, WFCS failed to take adequate corrective action, allowing the representative to continue this pattern of potentially unsuitable trading.

The investigation also revealed broader systemic issues within WFCS. At least 40 other representatives engaged in similar short-term trading practices, recommending 1,504 syndicate preferred stock and CEF purchases that were sold at a loss within 180 days. WFCS's surveillance system only flagged trades held for 90 days or less, missing 1,253 positions held between 91 and 180 days.

Furthermore, WFCS's written supervisory procedures were found to be deficient. They lacked clear definitions of short-term trading and provided no explicit guidance on appropriate holding periods for syndicate products. The firm also failed to take reasonable follow-up actions when potential issues were flagged.

Financial Impact and Firm Profits

During the relevant period, WFCS profited significantly from these practices, earning approximately $2,031,972 in selling concessions from syndicate purchases and about $599,024 in sales commissions from subsequent sales. These figures underscore the potential conflict of interest between the firm's financial gains and its customers' best interests.

This enforcement action is part of a broader pattern of regulatory issues for WFCS. In December 2021, the firm was censured and ordered to pay $3,367,929 in restitution for supervisory failures related to 529 plan recommendations. That same month, it was also censured, fined $550,000, and ordered to pay $2,083,624 in restitution for supervisory failures related to Unit Investment Trust rollovers. In September 2020, WFCS faced similar sanctions for failures related to variable annuity switches. Earlier, in February 2020, the firm was censured and ordered to pay a $35,000,000 civil penalty (jointly with an affiliate) for failing to supervise recommendations of single-inverse exchange traded funds.

This series of actions points to persistent challenges in WFCS's compliance and supervisory frameworks, raising questions about the firm's ability to effectively oversee its vast network of approximately 19,000 registered representatives across 5,000 branches.

As part of the settlement, WFCS neither admitted nor denied the charges but consented to the entry of FINRA's findings. The firm has agreed to pay the fine, restitution, and disgorgement as ordered. FINRA noted that by May 2023, WFCS had implemented an improved trade review system and enhanced written procedures for supervisory review of short-term trades in syndicate preferred stocks, CEFs, and MTNs. This suggests a proactive approach to addressing the identified deficiencies.

This enforcement action underscores several key points for the financial services industry. It highlights the critical importance of robust supervisory systems, particularly for complex or high-risk products, and the need for clear, comprehensive written procedures that provide explicit guidance on trading practices. The case also emphasizes the importance of prompt and effective follow-up on identified red flags and illustrates the potential conflicts of interest inherent in compensation structures that may incentivize unsuitable trading practices.

FINRA's action against Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC serves as a stark reminder of the regulatory expectations placed on financial institutions. It highlights the ongoing challenges faced by large firms in maintaining effective compliance systems across extensive networks of representatives. As the financial landscape continues to evolve, firms must remain vigilant in their supervisory practices to protect retail investors and maintain the integrity of the markets.

The repeated nature of WFCS's supervisory failures suggests that deeper, structural changes may be necessary to address these persistent issues. Industry observers will likely be watching closely to see how WFCS and similar institutions respond to these challenges in the coming months and years.

The GRC Report is your premier destination for the latest in governance, risk, and compliance news. As your reliable source for comprehensive coverage, we ensure you stay informed and ready to navigate the dynamic landscape of GRC. Beyond being a news source, the GRC Report represents a thriving community of professionals who, like you, are dedicated to GRC excellence. Explore our insightful articles and breaking news, and actively participate in the conversation to enhance your GRC journey.